The Great Multipolar Reset: Globalist Vampires in Bed With The BRICS

by 009 | Off-Guardian

One thing that is consistent about the blood-sucking globalist vampires—they have an irresistible urge to tell you what they are going to do. Their policy of hiding things in plain sight works as a psychological tool for them, because it paralyses opposition by instilling the belief in the inevitability of a narrative.

A case in point, on the World Economic Forum website, it states in plain English: “The geopolitical landscape is undergoing a profound transformation, giving rise to a world order that is both multi-polar and multi-conceptual.”

This idea of a profound transformation is central to the Great Reset thesis, advocated by Klaus Schwab and his army of useful vampires.

Do the globalist vampires really drink blood and eat babies? I really don’t know because they never invite me to any of their Satanic blood-drinking, baby-eating parties …

Roseanne Barr has some thoughts on the subject though.

One article on the WEF website, in the members only Geopolitics section, an anonymous author (probably Klaus Schwab) does some WEF-splaining:

As global power has shifted, the differences in norms and values among geopolitical heavyweights have become more glaring. The period following World War II, first characterized by the bipolarity of the Cold War and then the unipolarity of US hegemony, has given way to a phase in which power is more diffused. At the centre of this upheaval is an evolution of the respective roles played by the US and China, and a changing relationship between these two economic behemoths. Patterns of influence, cooperation and competition are also changing among a broader group of countries that includes Russia, India, a number of states in Europe and the Middle East, and the Global South (which includes much of Africa, Latin America and the Caribbean, and Asia). Decades ago the political scientist Francis Fukuyama predicted that in the wake of the Cold War, liberal democracy would prove to be ‘the’ model for governance in these places.”

The mention of Francis Fukuyama is a reference to his book The End of History, where he argued that the neo-liberal order of American democracy was the final stage of political evolution. The end of the Cold War in 1990 meant that humanity had reached “not just … the passing of a particular period of post-war history, but the end of history as such: That is, the end-point of mankind’s ideological evolution and the universalization of Western liberal democracy as the final form of human government.” Read Full Article  >