Biden-Harris Covertly Adopted UN Pact Placing USA Under Global Governance, Elimination of Free Speech

By Andrea Widburg | American Thinker

When five different people send you a link, you know that something very important has happened, even if the drive-by media aren’t trumpeting it on their outlets. In this case, it’s Robert Williams’ report at the Gatestone Institute that, in September, the Harris-Biden administration, without fanfare, adopted a UN pact that gives the UN and the World Economic Forum (“WEF”) control over American speech, foreign policy, and, possibly, internal sovereignty. Thankfully, while the administration can sign someone’s name on the dotted line, the Constitution means that signature is invalid. But we’re not in the clear: That invalidity works only if we don’t have a government that acts as if the UN pact applies.

The pact is the UN’s Pact for the Future. Williams describes it this way:

At the Summit of the Future in September 2024, world leaders passed the UN’s Pact for the Future to transform global governance, the Digital Compact and the Declaration on Future Generations. These agreements usher in a dystopian future, where the UN — an active supporter of terrorism and arguably the world’s most corrupt international entity, led by socialists, communists and dictatorships — in partnership with the unelected and unaccountable World Economic Forum, led by Klaus Schwab and his covey of billionaire business leaders, is given unprecedented power over the peoples of sovereign countries, who have had no say whatsoever on the contents of this pact, because it has been kept hidden from them.

[snip]

A large part of the Pact is dedicated to “turbocharging” the UN’s Agenda 2030. Much of this consists of fighting the fake crisis of “climate change” by achieving “net-zero” carbon dioxide emissions. Hidden at the very bottom of the 56-page document — action point 54 — is actually one of the most important items: the power-grab of the UN’s secretary-general: strengthening “the international response to complex global shocks”:

[Quoted material omitted.]

The UN secretary-general, in other words, is to control responses to “global shocks”…

This would mean that any kind of event that captures the media’s imagination, everything from “climate change” to an Eastern European border dispute to genocidal Islamic attacks on Israel, would come under the UN’s purview. America would be subordinated to the UN in its responses. Pax American would end. The UN—the anti-American, antisemitic, anti-capitalist, pro-Islamic UN—would be the world’s new policeman. Read Full Article >