Is Trump Creating The Great American Technate as Envisioned by Technocracy Inc.?
by Patrick Wood | Technocracy News
Well, nobody saw this coming. In one fell swoop, President Trump has just traced out Technocracy’s mystery map of the North American Technate, which stretched from Greenland to just beyond Panama. This far exceeds George W. Bush’s failed attempt to create the North American Union in 2005-2006 to merge the U.S., Mexico, and Canada.
Let’s review the highlights first:
- Trump offers to buy Greenland but doesn’t rule out force to get it.
- Trump says that the U.S. is going to reclaim the Panama Canal from the Chinese and Panama, and again, he doesn’t rule out force to get it
- Trump announced a name change from the Gulf of Mexico to the Gulf of America.
- Trump states intent to make Canada into the 51st state
To get some background, you must read my white paper written in 2006, Toward A North American Union. This was written before I discovered historic Technocracy and related it to the Trilateral Commission’s New International Economic Order. Now it makes perfect sense.
The North American Union Under Pres. George W. Bush
The string of events leading up to the “The Three Amigos” (George Bush, Vicente Fox, Stephen Harper) getting together in 2005, that led to a Task Force to study the integration. They ultimately issued this statement:
“The Task Force proposes the creation by 2010 of a North American community to enhance security, prosperity, and opportunity. We propose a community based on the principle affirmed in the March 2005 Joint Statement of the three leaders that ‘our security and prosperity are mutually dependent and complementary.’ Its boundaries will be defined by a common external tariff and an outer security perimeter within which the movement of people, products, and capital will be legal, orderly, and safe. Its goal will be to guarantee a free, secure, just, and prosperous North America.”
This was predictably the fallout of the North America Free Trade Agreement that was negotiated by President George H.W. Bush in 1992. Immediately after his inauguration, President Bill Clinton became the champion of NAFTA and orchestrated its passage with a massive Executive Branch effort. This was a seamless transition because both Clinton and Bush were members of the Trilateral Commission.
Trilateral Henry Kissinger promoted the passage of NAFTA in 1993:
“It will represent the most creative step toward a new world order taken by any group of countries since the end of the Cold War, and the first step toward an even larger vision of a free-trade zone for the entire Western Hemisphere.” [NAFTA] is not a conventional trade agreement, but the architecture of a new international system.“
In 2003, Trilateral Richard Haas and President of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) picked up the rhetoric by stating:
“Ten years after NAFTA, it is obvious that the security and economic futures of Canada, Mexico, and the United States are intimately bound. But there is precious little thinking available as to where the three countries need to be in another ten years and how to get there. I am excited about the potential of this task force to help fill this void.”
After the CFR Task Force issued its approval for continuing with the integration, the Three Amigos met in Waco, Texas at a summit on March 23, 2005 on the creation of Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPPNA). Their joint statement was issued:
“We, the elected leaders of Canada, Mexico, and the United States, have met in Texas to announce the establishment of the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America.
“We will establish working parties led by our ministers and secretaries that will consult with stakeholders in our respective countries. These working parties will respond to the priorities of our people and our businesses, and will set specific, measurable, and achievable goals. They will outline concrete steps that our governments can take to meet these goals, and set dates that will ensure the continuous achievement of results.
“Within 90 days, ministers will present their initial report after which, the working parties will submit six-monthly reports. Because the Partnership will be an ongoing process of cooperation, new items will be added to the work agenda by mutual agreement as circumstances warrant.“ Read Full Article >
Related Articles:
Technocracy Ascending-Part 1: Why It’s Crucial to Understand the End Game