World Economic Forum proposes AI to automate censorship of “hate speech” and “misinformation”

(by Didi Rankovich | Reclaim The Net) – The World Economic Forum (WEF) continues to beat the drum of the need to somehow merge “AI” and humans, as a supposed panacea to pretty much any ill plaguing society and economy.

It’s never a sure bet if this Davos-based elite’s mouthpiece comes up with its outlandish “solutions” and “proposals” as a way to reinforce existing, or introduce new narratives; or just to appear busy and earn its keep from those bankrolling it.

Nevertheless, here we are, with the WEF turning its attention toward what’s apparently the burning issue in everybody’s life right now.

No – it’s not the runaway inflation, energy costs, and even food security in many parts of the world. For how dedicated to globalization the organization is, it’s strangely tone-deaf to what is actually happening around the globe.

And as people struggle to pay their bills and dread the coming winter, the WEF obliviously talks about “the dark world of online harms.”

The group seems to be hard at work squaring the circle of combating internet trolls, i.e., solving the broadly and vaguely defined problem of “online abuse.” It’s what you’d expect it to supposedly be about: “child abuse, disinformation, extremism, and fraud.”

Once a reader wades through the weeds of verbal and narrative smokescreens, though, the big takeaway from the article posted on the group’s website is that neither human censors, nor censorship resulting from “AI” (in reality, just machine learning algorithms) is enough any longer.

“By uniquely combining the power of innovative technology, off-platform intelligence collection and the prowess of subject-matter experts who understand how threat actors operate, scaled detection of online abuse can reach near-perfect precision,” says the WEF.

But what is this supposed to mean?

At some point toward the end, the WEF finally spits it out (but spoiler: it still doesn’t make a whole lot of sense): instead of relying on what is throughout the article continuously and erroneously referred to as “AI” – the WEF says it is proposing “a new framework: rather than relying on AI to detect at scale and humans to review edge cases, an intelligence-based approach is crucial.”

It’s well worth quoting the entire techno-bubble word salad that is supposed to be the sales pitch of the writeup:

“By bringing human-curated, multi-language, off-platform intelligence into learning sets, AI will then be able to detect nuanced, novel abuses at scale, before they reach mainstream platforms. Supplementing this smarter automated detection with human expertise to review edge cases and identify false positives and negatives and then feeding those findings back into training sets will allow us to create AI with human intelligence baked in.”

In this way – “trust and safety teams can stop threats rising online before they reach users,” writes the WEF.

Finally one can start discerning the argument here – once converted into “human readable” format – as simply pressuring social networks to start moving towards “preemptive censorship?”

And if that’s true – what an argument it is.