Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

by Jesse Smith

H.G. Wells 1940 fiction book “The New World Order”, advocated that nation states join together to form a socialist and scientifically managed world government to achieve peace and prevent future world wars. For over a century, significant changes have taken place bringing the world closer to Wells’ imagined global governance structure where the authority and relevance of nation states is increasingly diminished.

James Warburg, a German born, American banker and Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) member once boldly stated in 1950, that “we shall have world government whether or not you like it, by conquest or consent.” Though many do important and beneficial work, non-government organizations (NGOs) have been one of the chief weapons employed in paving the road toward Warburg’s vision of world government.

Throughout much of the 20th century, wealthy oligarchs such as John D. Rockefeller, Andrew Carnegie, and J.P. Morgan began extending their influence through the creation and funding of foundations, think tanks, charities, faith-based organizations, and civil society organizations (CSOs). Through this vast network of interconnected organizations functioning at the local, state, and national levels, the globalist cabal has been able to gradually erode nation-state sovereignty under the guise of promoting world peace, advancing human rights, and eliminating poverty. To top it off, many of the institutions they created were granted legal immunity allowing them to function outside the laws of the nations they operated within.

The NGO racket is propped up by a long list of oligarch-owned corporations and their government accomplices who provide funding through donations, grants, sponsorships, and endowments. Together, these myriad groups form a powerful bloc influencing government policy at all levels, shaping attitudes and opinions, and building an interdependent global financial system that almost every citizen relies on for survival.

Though a few builders of this parasitic network have been named, this investigation focuses on the network itself and how it stealthily works behind the scenes eroding democratic institutions to make way for global authority. For the purposes of this article, NGOs and CSOs will be used interchangeably though their definitions slightly differ.

Nation States Going the Way of the Dinosaurs?

I’ll bet that in the next hundred years… nationhood as we know it will be obsolete; all states will recognize a single, global authority.”
– Strobe Talbot, Pres. Clinton’s Deputy Secretary of State, (July 20, 1992). “America Abroad: The Birth of the Global Nation,” Time.

In his 1967 book, The Ghost in the Machine, author and journalist Arthur Koestler popularized the idea of a holarchy. Roughly defined as a system of interconnectedness and interdependence, a holarchy could apply to biological, ecological, and even social systems. A holarchy forms when individual, semi-autonomous “holons” link together in a hierarchical structure to form a whole. However, Koestler’s holarchy is not strictly top-down in authority but fosters a degree of autonomy and cooperation from those at the bottom as well.

The holarchy concept almost perfectly describes the intricate relationship between NGOs, governments, multinational corporations, and global banking cartels. A 2017 Global NGO Online Technology Report compiled some fascinating facts about NGOs, revealing that:

  • There were an estimated 10 million NGOs worldwide.
  • NGOs would have the 5th largest economy in the world if they were a country.
  • The number of people worldwide donating money to NGOs increased from 1.2 billion in 2011 to 1.4 billion in 2014. By 2030, the number is expected to grow to 2.5 billion.

In addition, the U.S. Department of State cites that 1.5 million NGOs currently operate in America. The number of foundations alone in the U.S. is estimated at more than 86,000 with total assets worth over $1 trillion. On the other side of the Atlantic, according to Global Giving, there are almost 855,000 nonprofits operating in Germany.

Despite the overwhelming breadth of the NGO network, it is well coordinated and mostly serves a few specific agendas. Many of the seemingly unrelated organizations around the world actually serve the goals of the United Nations (UN) and other intergovernmental organizations that operate with impunity around the world. Despite their altruistic mission statements and noble visions, many NGO agendas are tied to supporting the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), creating a digital societal structure and global economy as outlined in the UN Global Digital Compact, and advancing AI governance.

Working individually and in tandem, these initiatives could completely upend the global order and shift control of individuals, resources, governance, and wealth toward the oligarchs atop the global holarchy. The rest of this report focuses on how international organizations collaborate with the NGO ecosystem to achieve these outcomes.

The United Nations and Sovereign Immunity

2020 screenshot of United Nations New World Order Project website. Source: unnwo.org

The development of global governance is part of the evolution of human efforts to organize life on the planet, …we are convinced that it is time for the world to move on from the designs evolved over the centuries and given new form in the establishment of the United Nations nearly fifty years ago.”
– UN Commission on Global Governance, 1995

The ultimate goal of the UN is to establish a global government using the so-called climate crisis as the means to achieve it. This goal was recently reiterated by Jeffrey Sachs, President of the UN Sustainable Development Solutions Network (SDSN) and one of America’s leading ambassadors for the SDGs.

The United Nations is the largest intergovernmental organization in the world. Just after its creation, the United States quickly passed the International Organizations Immunities Act on December 29, 1945 providing the UN and other transnational organizations with privileges, immunities, tax exemptions, and freedoms from certain search and seizure laws. Even its headquarters in New York is considered sovereign territory where “no federal, state or local officer or official of the United States, whether administrative, judicial, military or police, may enter UN Headquarters, except with the consent of and under conditions agreed to by the Secretary-General of the Organization.”

In 1946, the General Convention granted the UN both the status of a legal person and immunity in all member states. The UN General Convention states in article II, section 2, that:

The United Nations, its property and assets wherever located and by whomsoever held, shall enjoy immunity from every form of legal process except insofar as in any particular case it has expressly waived its immunity. It is, however, understood that no waiver of immunity shall extend to any measure of execution.

In addition to immunity from suit, the General Convention provides for the “inviolability” of United Nations premises and property which basically means that they are exempted from any search, requisition, confiscation, or other forms of executive, administrative, judicial or legislative interference. The same inviolability applies to the archives of the United Nations.”

Specialized agencies within the UN such as the World Health Organization (WHO), UNESCO, and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) also share the same privileges and immunities.

UN officials, employees, special experts and representatives of member states also enjoy certain privileges and immunities while the Secretary-General, Under-Secretaries-General and Assistant Secretaries-General enjoy full diplomatic privileges and immunities. The UN is also exempt from all direct taxes, customs duties, and quotas concerning goods for its official use.

Though the UN is tax exempt, taxpayers in all 193 member states help fund it. In 2023, governments sent more than $46 billion in assessed, voluntary, and other contributions to the United Nations with the U.S. (the largest contributor) sending almost $13 billion.

UN Revenue by Government Donor, Source: UNSCEB

Rigging the Game at Every Societal Level

The United Nations system employs one of the largest NGO networks in the world. The facts outlining the UNs ability to function outside of national laws, economies, constitutions, and democratic processes is important when considering the various ways the UN works with civil society.

The UN has several agencies designated to ensure its agenda is funneled through the countless NGOs functioning around the world. One of the primary ways is through consultative status with the Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC), one of six main organs working to “advance the three dimensions of sustainable development – economic, social and environmental” and forge “consensus on ways forward… to achieve internationally agreed goals.” According to their website:

Consultative status with the Economic and Social Council provides non-governmental organizations (NGOs) with access not only to ECOSOC, but also to its many subsidiary bodies, to the various human rights mechanisms of the United Nations, …as well as special events organized by the President of the General Assembly. There are three types of ECOSOC consultative status for NGOs. As of April 2021, 5,593 NGOs enjoyed active consultative status with ECOSOC.”

Another avenue of UN-NGO collaboration is through the Integrated Civil Society Organizations (iCSO) System, which provides an online database of accredited NGOs working with the UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs (DESA). As stated on their website, the iCSO:

…provides online registration of general profiles for civil society organizations, including address, contacts, activities and meeting participation. It facilitates the application procedure for consultative status with the Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC) and assists accredited NGOs in submitting quadrennial reports and in designating representatives to the United Nations.”

The total list of organizations included in the iCSO database is almost 15,000. Of these, 6,494 have consultative status with the ECOSOC.

NGOs can also partner with the UN through the UN Department of Global Communications (DGC). The DGC’s Civil Society Unit connects with some 1,500 non-governmental organizations to “foster greater coherence around cross-cutting and emerging issues on the UN’s agenda and by facilitating meaningful civil society engagement in UN processes.” The Department of Global Communications defines CSOs and NGOs as any non-profit, voluntary citizens’ group which is organized on a local, national or international level.

One of DGCs primary directives is to promote official UN narratives and combat so-called misinformation regarding climate change through Verified, a joint initiative of the United Nations and Purpose (with support from The Rockefeller Foundation). Much like Purpose, many of the more than 1600 NGOs functioning as extensions of the DGC employ propaganda to push climate doom and other UN agendas.

Furthering the incestuous relationship between the UN and NGOs is the Non-Governmental Liaison Service (UN-NGLS), located within the Civil Society Unit. The NGLS is “responsible for the Call for Participation among Civil Society Entities (not in ECOSOC-status) who have expertise in the specific, substantive areas of UN conferences, meetings, and events.” By offering a seat at the table, the UN gives the appearance of being inclusive and collaborative in its decision-making and global policy shaping. In fact, NGO participants are coopted into supporting the UN agenda through this process and serve as proxies pushing their plans forward in thousands of local communities far and wide.

The collusion between the UN and CSOs, can be further demonstrated through the mission of the United Nations Democracy Fund (UNDEF) created in 2005, revealing that it was:

…built to support projects that strengthen the voice of civil society, promote human rights, and encourage the participation of all groups in democratic processes. The large majority of UNDEF funds go to local civil society organizations – both in the transition and the consolidation phases of democratization.”

Though the agency claims to promote democracy and free speech, it appears this only applies to political action and dialogue in favor of promoting the SDGs. The UNDEF brochure underscores this point, stating that:

UNDEF projects span over 130 countries across the globe, advancing the Sustainable Development Goals, in particular, Goal 16: Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions” (emphasis added).

Another significant quote appears on page 6, where a UN official claims that:

Achieving SDG 16 – peace, justice and strong institutions requires building trust and creating a safe space for dialogue between opposing views. If we can open the space to talk about these issues, that is how we can get to these interesting conversations that get us to the solutions that get us to the SDGs” (emphasis added).
–Annemarie Hou, Executive Director of the UN Office for Partnerships

One more important building block in the UN/NGO universe is the World Association of Non-Governmental Associations (WANGO), yet another fervent supporter of the SDGs. Though not an official UN agency, WANGO is a global organization that helps strengthen, connect, and increase public understanding of the role NGOs play in “solving humanity’s basic problems.” Its database includes over 54,000 organizations representing more than 190 countries. One of its main partners is the recently dismantled and corrupt to the core United States Agency for International Development (USAID).

Image: WANGO

Founded on August 1, 2000, the World Association of United Nations Non-Governmental Organizations (WAUNNGO) was the precursor to WANGO. It was formed when 16 NGOs came together to promote the ideals of the United Nations. Rev. Sun Myung Moon was instrumental in broadening the vision for WAUNNGO and its eventual transformation into WANGO. Its first organized events were centered on promoting the United Nations Millennium Declaration. WANGOs fervent support of the Millenium Declaration also demonstrated its commitment to strengthening the UN itself as indicated in article VII, where it proclaims the United Nations “is the indispensable common house of the entire human family through which we will seek to realize our universal aspirations for peace, cooperation and development.”

The Millenium Declaration served as the backbone for the 2030 UN Agenda for Sustainable Development and the 17 Sustainable Development Goals adopted in 2015 and the legally binding Paris Agreement of 2016 of which WANGO is also an ardent advocate.

The World Bank and IMF Impact Global Finance Through NGOs

The UN is not alone in constructing a substantial sphere of influence within the non-governmental arena. The World Bank Group is also a major player. Formed in 1946 to provide loans to postwar European nations, the World Bank Group (WBG) consists of five agencies and is headquartered in Washington, D.C. Its current mission centers on alleviating poverty throughout developing countries in Africa, Latin America and Asia.

The International Monetary Fund (IMF), also founded in 1946, seeks to stabilize the international monetary system, monitor the world’s currencies, and reduce poverty around the world. The IMF focuses on immediate issues while the WBG focuses on long-range economic development. 189 countries are members of both organizations, but IMF membership must first be secured before becoming a WBG affiliate.

The World Bank has been working with CSOs since 1981. Through its Partnership Charter, it works with stakeholders in the private sector, faith-based organizations, corporate and private foundations, parliamentarians, and civil society organizations.

The IMF also pairs with CSOs, parliamentarians, think tanks, and youth leaders at both the national and global level.

Through treaty-based relationships, both the World Bank Group and IMF extend support to the United Nations in advancing the 17 SDGs. The World Bank discloses that:

Over the years, the WBG has collaborated with the UN in nearly every region and sector, and its engagement has deepened since the adoption of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), and now with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).”

The IMF “is engaged with the SDGs when they affect economic stability and sustainable and inclusive growth” and “has launched several initiatives to enhance support for its member countries as they pursue the SDGs.” Regarding the importance of NGOs in expanding global economic governance, the IMF states that:

Civil society organizations (CSOs) have become significant players in global economic governance since the 1990s…Dialogue with civil society groups is only one part of the IMF’s public outreach strategy. Other elements of similar importance include IMF contacts with parliamentarians, politicians, mass media, and citizens at large.”

These major players within the global financial system have made it difficult for nations needing monetary assistance to receive it without agreeing to support the SDGs and other global initiatives. To tighten the fiscal noose, the IMF and WBG have launched a joint Climate Change Policy Assessment (CCPA) as “an overarching assessment of countries’ climate strategies.” In addition, the IMF has also “been contributing to the global efforts to monitor the implementation of the SDGs and serves as the custodian agency for four SDG indicators using its databases on macroeconomic and financial statistics.”

What all this assessment and monitoring amounts to is the IMF and WBG’s ability to halt cash flow to countries failing to mitigate climate risks as conditions of financial assistance. The World Bank and IMF hold the keys to improving infrastructure, advancing technologically, and securing a better living for citizens in many nations, but these benefits come with strings attached. The NGO offshoots serve as an added layer working to secure compliance.

NGOs Permeate the G7 Nations

The Group of Seven (G7), formulated in 1973 in response to the oil crisis and resulting recession is an informal coalition that meets annually to coordinate global economic policy. The G7 includes Italy, Canada, France, Germany, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States of America. The coalition rotates its Presidency each year with Canada assuming the role for 2025. The European Union is also a participant and is considered a de-facto eighth member.

According to Investopedia, in 1999 the G7 decided to “…get more directly involved in “managing the international monetary system” by creating the Financial Stability Forum (FSB). The FSB is made up of major national financial authorities, such as finance ministers, central bankers, and international financial bodies.”

The FSB was formally established in 2009 and is closely associated with the Bank of International Settlements (BIS) in Basel, Switzerland. The BIS is known as the coordinating body for all central banks. Like the UN and other international bodies, the central banking cartel operates with total impunity. According to researcher Corey Lynn:

There are 76 international organizations who hold extensive immunities and privileges, in addition to the Bank for International Settlements along with 63 central banks and financial institutions that function with BIS, to create a complete control framework that operates entirely outside the law from what all other organizations must adhere to.”

At the 2021 G7 meeting in Cornwall, England the group committed to pushing the COVID-19 vaccine globally along with several climate related agendas, including:

  • Vaccinating the world by getting as many safe vaccines to as many people as possible as fast as possible.
  • Supporting science in a mission to shorten the cycle for the development of safe and effective vaccines, treatments and tests from 300 to 100 days.
  • Achieving net-zero carbon emissions by 2050.
  • Limiting the increase in global temperatures to 1.5 degrees.
  • Increasing and improving climate finance.
  • Conserving at least 30% of our land and oceans by 2030.

In keeping with the theme of public-private collusion to push these agendas, the G7 receives help from their own coterie of eight CSOs that “help create a more structured exchange” between non-state actors. These groups include the Civil Society 7, Business 7, Labour 7, Pride 7, Think Tank 7, Urban 7, Women 7, and Youth 7. Regarding their association, the Civil Society 7 (C7) website explicitly states:

In close exchanges with G7 representatives, the Engagement Groups contribute recommendations on current G7 issues, which seek to find their way into agreements and policies” (emphasis added).

In addition, the C7 “serves as a platform to channel the voices of global civil society and present recommendations on crucial international issues.” The C7 consists of working groups engaged in virtual and in person discussions chaired by a steering committee. The related strategies of advancing the SDGs, mitigating the climate crisis, supporting the Paris Agreement, and establishing a more equitable global financial system appear in its thematic priorities.

A sampling of the efforts of the other seven groups reveals consistency with the broader UN agenda. For example:

  • Business 7’s 2024 Summit focused on economic security and global value chains; data economy and digital transformation; energy, environment and climate change transition; future of work and the impact of AI on business and the economy.
  • Labour 7 is tasked with prioritizing sustainable development and a “Just Transition” to a low-carbon economy centered on the needs and rights of workers and communities.
  • Think Tank 7 addresses the urgent need for action on climate change and the promotion of sustainable development practices to… achieve the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). This group also examines ways to successfully digitalize the global economy and mitigate risks.
  • Urban 7 works to “develop a common understanding of current developments and key topics of the G7 agenda that are relevant for sustainable and climate-neutral urban development and ensure a socially inclusive transformation process.”

The last three groups including the Women 7 and Pride 7, focus on issues of equal rights for women and LGBTQ+ persons while the Youth 7 centers on helping youth “make an impact and join official global policy making processes.”

Of these units, The Urban 7 (U7) may be the most impactful for its reach into the places where most of the world’s population dwells. The U7 has been instrumental in fostering collaboration between the G7 nations and local governments through Mayor’s Summits held in 2022 and 2023. These events were supported by the International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI) and the Global Parliament of Mayors, both major players working to transform the world’s cities according to the vision prescribed in the UN 2030 Agenda.

Their ideas may sound great until one realizes that the vision includes smart cities where everything and everyone is continuously connected and surveilled through Internet of Things (IoT), 5G & 6G, digital ID, digital currency, and biometric authentication technologies.

The ICLEI is active in over 125 countries and works with more than 2500 local and regional governments devoted to sustainable urban development. According to their website:

“ICLEI engages at the local to global levels, shaping policy and sparking action to transform urban environments worldwide. We build connections across levels of government, sectors and stakeholder groups, sparking city-to-city, city-to-region, local-to-global and local-to-national connections… ICLEI strengthens action at all levels, in support of sustainable urban development.”

The vision and mission of the Global Parliament of Mayors includes statements about bringing cities to the world fore, needing global governance to evolve, and the need for mayors, their cities and networks to partner equally in building global governance “for an inclusive and sustainable world, and achieve political change on a global scale.”

In 2020, the Parliament sent an open letter to UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres urging him to “launch and lead the global dialogue with cities and leaders about the United Nations.” The letter also called for the UN General Assembly to “take the existing international political system into consideration, install representative bodies of cities in the UN system and become the United Nations and Cities of the World” so that the goals of the Paris Agreement and SDGs can be achieved.

Global Impact of The G20

Many nations not included in the G7 wanted representation on the global stage and in 1999 the Group of Twenty (G20) was established. Its purpose is to bring the world’s major economies together to discuss and address global challenges which today largely include two familiar topics: climate change and sustainable development.

Through the Civil20 (C20), The G20 engages CSOs “to ensure that government decisions reflect the interests of citizens and are worthy of people’s trust.” The C20 provides value to the G20 as “the home of innovators and experts on technology, sustainable development, gender equality, climate emergency, health, education and in all G20-related themes.”

Current Civil20 principles were established by 800 civil society representatives during the 2019 Summit in Tokyo. Among several other principles, the C20 affirmed that “gender equality is a fundamental human right, it is essential for promoting sustainable development and achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).” In addition, the C20 supports the “Leave No One Behind” principle of UN 2030 Agenda believing inclusivity and equity are essential to the pursuit of sustainable development.

At the 2024 C20 conference in Brazil, additional recommendations supporting Agenda 2030 and the SDGs included:

  • Implementing just transition plans, with fossil fuels divestment and more ambitious climate mitigation and adaptation measures in line with a 1.5oC scenario.
  • Freeing up resources to finance the implementation of the 2030 Agenda and the Climate Agenda for low and middle-income countries.
  • Increasing funds for humanitarian aid and sustainable development in affected regions.
  • Recognizing and supporting the catalytic role of philanthropy, particularly community philanthropy, to promote sustainable development.
  • Generating additional and predictable funds…to allow governments and civil society actions [to] accelerate climate health and SDGs financing…

The C20-Climate Synthesis and the G20 briefing report further reinforces the climate crisis narrative, adapting the One Health approach, limiting global warming to 1.5oC, ending fossil fuel subsidies, introducing carbon pricing, phasing out coal by 2030, and allocating at least $100 billion annually to the Paris Agreement by 2025.

In addition to the climate related recommendations, a policy brief on Digitalization & Technology recommends:

  • Bridging vulnerabilities’ gaps (such as gender, disability, sexuality, gender identity, ethnicity, race, and territory) in access to connectivity.
  • Ensuring connectivity and device universal access for the public education community.
  • Establishing cross-border programs to address infrastructure gaps and ensure access to connectivity for all.

The brief also supports efforts to expand digital public infrastructure (DPI), guarantee human rights, and increase access to essential services. It advocates for: helping nations achieve digital autonomy; regulated and interoperable AI innovations; and utilizing AI agents trained on representative data while reflecting local contexts and populations.

To the naïve these aims may seem benevolent, but when understanding the goal is global control, they can be cast in a much different light. In short, an AI control grid is being erected and they want it to be inclusive of everyone, everywhere, hence the move toward all things digital. You will have a “right” to access “essential” services provided you comply with the rules.

Understanding What Is at Stake

Peeling back the layers of an onion often leads to tears. Unveiling the intertwined layers within the global NGO empire might lead to madness.

Additional global transnational organizations partnering with NGOs include the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Organization of American States (OAS), but this is just a partial list. Even regional government entities and alliances such as the European Union (EU) and BRICS participate in the public-private partnership scheme.

It should go without saying that each of these organizations and political unions (yes, even BRICS) are in full alignment with the UN SDGs, the shift toward digitalization as outlined in UN Global Digital Compact, and the quest for AI dominance amongst other global initiatives. A deeper dive exploring the intergovernmental organizations not mentioned here would certainly uncover even greater levels of collusion.

Source: UNAOC

One of the reasons many dismiss the all-encompassing agendas the United Nations and its cohorts develop and finance is because at a surface level they appear noble. However, it’s imperative not to be fooled by humanitarian cliches such as diversity, equity, and inclusion, human rights of all, ending poverty and hunger, and common good of all. They are mere smokescreens for the broader objectives of global powers seeking to create a more centralized, technocratic world. In this world, individual rights and the authority of nation-state governments are ceded to collective powers colluding to create a new world order. Leaving no one behind means everyone, everywhere is to be included in this new world system with no exceptions. 

A member of the U.S. delegation to the UN has recently denounced Agenda 2030 and the SDGs saying that “globalist endeavors like Agenda 2030 lost at the ballot box.” This may seem like a positive development, however I argue that the U.S. is still after the same end goals as the UN, World Bank, IMF, G7, G20 and the NGO network – a centrally planned digital control grid complete with AI, digital currency (CBDC/stablecoins), digital ID, 24/7 surveillance, biometrics & facial recognition, smart cities, autonomous transportation, and much more.

Despite the plethora of evidence provided, some may still believe this is all just a crazy conspiracy theory. However, the true intentions of the global players can be found in their own words, as exemplified in the following quotes.

“…In short, the ‘house of world order’ will have to be built from the bottom up rather than from the top down. It will look like a great ‘booming, buzzing confusion… but an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece, will accomplish much more than the old-fashioned frontal assault.”
– Richard N. Gardner, The Hard Road to World Order in “Foreign Affairs,” April 1974.

“Regionalism must precede Globalism. We foresee a seamless system of governance from local communities, individual states, regional unions, and up through the United Nations itself.
– UN Commission on Global Governance

“The UN must gear itself for a time when regionalism becomes more ascendant worldwide and assist the process in advance of that time. Regional cooperation and integration should be seen as an important and integral part of a balanced system of global governance.”
– UN Commission on Global Governance

“The concept of national sovereignty has been an immutable, indeed sacred, principle of international relations. It is a principle which will yield only slowly and reluctantly to the new imperatives of global environmental cooperation.”
– Maurice Strong, “Stockholm to Rio: A Journey Down a Generation,” UN Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED), 1992

“…This regionalization is in keeping with the Tri-Lateral Plan which calls for a gradual convergence of East and West, ultimately leading toward the goal of ‘one world government’…National sovereignty is no longer a viable concept…”
– Zbigniew Brzezinski, 1970

“Out of these troubled times, our fifth objective — a new world order — can emerge… We are now in sight of a United Nations that performs as envisioned by its founders.”
– President George Bush, Sep 11, 1990

“The objective, clearly enunciated by the leaders of UNCED, is to bring about a change in the present system of independent nations. The future is to be World Government with central planning by the United Nations. Fear of environmental crises — whether real or not — is expected to lead to compliance.”
– Dixy Lee Ray, “Blame it on Rio? Platitudes and Attitudes: A Perspective.” Ecologic, August 1992, p. 14.

More in:Original Articles

Leave a Comment