ID2020

(by John Stone | Age of Autism) – I am returning to my article published exactly two years ago on Nov 1, 2019 in which I described some of the malevolent forces at play in global politics and predicted that the arrival of the new decade would be calamitous: I looked at the Global Health Security Agenda launched by Obama and then homed in on vaccine ID looking at the so-called ID 2020 Alliance (which brought together the vaccine industry cartel GAVI, with Microsoft and the Rockefeller Foundatio (supposing these were ever entirely separate entities), and the European Commission roadmap – then just published – which  aimed amid zero publicity to have vaccine ID passports in place for the Union by 2022 (although there is no description of any mechanism that would enable this project).

Of course, there was never any democratic stimulus for these initiatives: they started with corporate interests lobbying and infiltrating global and governmental institutions. According to a 2020 Wiki addition:

In May 2016, at the United Nations Headquarters in New York, the inaugural ID2020 summit brought together over 400 people to discuss how to provide digital identity to all, a defined Sustainable Development Goal including to 1.5bn people living without any form of recognized identification…Experts in blockchain and other cryptographic technology joined with representatives of technical standards bodies to identify how technology and other private sector expertise could achieve the goal…

There is admittedly at this stage no mention here of vaccine status as an integral part of this new ID and GAVI is not named as an original participant although it is named in the article as a participant in an ID 2020 project taking place in Bangladesh in 2019. Naturally UN Sustainable Development Goal is affiliated to Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Again according to Wiki:

“ID2020 is a public-private consortium in service of the United Nations 2030 Sustainable Development Goal of providing legal identity for all people, including the world’s most vulnerable populations.

ID2020 has published a ten-point mission statement, which includes: “We believe that individuals must have control over their own digital identities, including how personal data is collected, used, and shared.”

This latter assurance does not seem remotely credible, not least because we have seen all too swiftly how vaccine ID eliminates personal privacy and autonomy in one fell swoop, but it can also be tied to personal financial credit and face recognition technology . A vaccination  ID scheme involving  ID 2020 Alliance rolled out in Bangladesh in 2019 already included luciferase fingerprinting. Moderna have also been collaborating with DARPA on hydrogel nano-chip for incorporation in its Covid vaccine by late 2021. Meanwhile, Microsoft are working on a cryptocurrency system using body activity data for ID complete with a “name of the beast” serial number. It is idle for those who devise these more and more invasive tracking systems or for the UN to pretend that they are concerned for individual human autonomy, except to defeat it.

When I wrote about this two years ago we knew nothing about Wuhan or  Event 201 (Global Pandemic Exercise)which took place on 18 October 2019 in New York, a collaboration between Johns Hopkins University (Center for Health Security), Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the World Economic Forum a deadly coronavirus spread from pig farms in South America, wittily taking place simultaneously with the opening of the World Military Games in Wuhan. Should anyone think to detect a benign intent behind 201 they perhaps need to consider the souvenir coronavirus “plush pillows” discovered by Kim Rossi in video footage – while presenting catastrophe for global citizen the Center for Health Security were thinking “cute mementos” of the historic occasion. Equally I did not know about the veiled but manic conversation  of Tony Fauci and Rick Bright at the Milken Institute on 29 October 2019 about events which might revolutionise medicine by facilitating the arrival of a whole new class of untested products, but it was all on its way. And there was that name “ID 2020”.

The ID2020 Alliance: The Global Totalitarian Project Hiding Behind The Vaccine Drive

These days history happens by stealth: the big shifts in power are often only incidentally reported in our mainstream news-media and can be hard to detect even by experienced watchers. Until a year ago almost no one had heard of the Global Health Security Agenda, although the project started in 2014 under the Obama administration and has already destabilised nations: something which is neither conjecture or “conspiracy theory” but easily established from public documents [1, 2] . Late last year I highlighted a column in electronic BMJ by J Stephen Morrison “senior vice president at the Center for Strategic and International Studies and director of its Global Health Policy Center” [3]:

“The term “smart power” was new to me when I encountered it recently in a British Medical Journal blog as part of the new-speak vocabulary of J Stephen Morrison ‘senior vice president at the Center for Strategic and International Studies and director of its Global Health Policy Center”.  Morrison’s article is interesting both because it discloses explicitly how 9/11 was made an opportunity  to draw health into the global security agenda of the United States while failing to understand how such a move might result in the shattering of “consensus” and the post war “Western post-war liberal order”: “smart power” even if it is smart is not “liberal” and will not lead to consensus. But it also spells out that the global vaccine program has become a covert instrument of US power. If Morrison by any chance laments the passing of the centre-left government in Italy, then perhaps the White House putting Italy and its health minister, Beatrice Lorenzin, in charge of global vaccine strategy was an error. 

“Morrison thinks it is a paradox but it is scarcely so if a government is seen to pursue coercive health measures over its citizens at the behest of a foreign power – even those who favor vaccination could be concerned at the state’s new found powers over their bodies (which might also be indefinitely extended). If that was not so smart a political move perhaps the technology is not so smart either – as I remarked  to Steven Salzberg a few years ago: “The unwelcome news is that the “cruise missiles and drone helicopters” of the war on disease often hit the wrong target, and the more cruise missiles and drone helicopters you unleash the greater the risk”.

“Frankly, no one knows what they are going to be injected with next. Smart bombs become too easily the agents of international chaos and mistrust: just so the smart bombs of the war on disease, both for what they can do to your body and what they can do to the political landscape, including destabilizing friendly governments. “Smart power” is also duplicitous: Italy is just the surrogate of the US. Why could the citizens of the world not have it directly from the mouth of Obama saying3 in effect ‘your bodies are not your own and we inject into them what we like?’.”

But the heat was turned up again at the beginning of 2019 when the World Health Organization declared “the vaccine hesitant” to be a threat to world health [2], and the Global health terror over measles was launched despite inadequate evidence either for the spread, or the casualties[1,4-6]. Also, of course, pinned to the tails of the largely artificial measles scare, was the demand for compliance with a host of other products to combat other diseases. Implausibly, health officials continue to stick to the baseless proposition that a two-month old infant can benefit from unlimited barrage of biological products without risk of harm, and never seem to have heard of the concept of “over-medication” [7].

And just in the last weeks, without publicity, the European Commission have published a document designed to lead to a vaccine ID being attached to the European passport by 2022 [8]. What is perhaps most alarming about this is that none of it has come into place with any democratic mandate at all: Obama’s manoeuvres were entirely executive, no one elected the European Commission and there has been no popular demand for such measures, in Italy one government was voted out having brought in mandates in the preceding months and another voted in committed to repealing them, and reneged on its promise. Where did it come from? Meanwhile, everywhere citizens who speak out are loaded with hatred and abuse by the mainstream media: journalists who were not there, do not know what happened, and do not know or apparently care about the complexity of the scientific literature. Read Full Article >

More in:Guest Posts

Leave a Comment