Did you know that the average time to successfully bring a new vaccine to market is between 4-10 years? Dr. Anthony Fauci, one of America’s foremost infectious disease experts, testified before Congress that it takes seven years on average to produce a vaccine and only six percent of vaccines tested actually make it to market (watch this short clip – sorry, the audio quality is bad). With this knowledge, alarm bells should be loudly ringing as Operation Warp Speed rampages forward to approve and distribute a coronavirus vaccine in record time.
According to a report published by the International Federation of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers & Associations (IFPMA), the process to develop a new vaccine is quite complex and even longer than what Dr. Fauci described. On page three the report states:
Almost all of the companies currently involved in making coronavirus vaccines are current IFPMA members. So why are they shortchanging the process they deem necessary to bring a vaccine to market? I’ll save the answer to this loaded question for another article in this series.
How can safety truly be the priority of Big Pharma drug peddlers when years of monitoring clinical trial participants are required to ensure there are no serious repercussions from vaccines? Political views do not matter regarding vaccine safety. This has nothing to do with the left vs. right culture war. No one should be lining up to take this experimental vaccine simply because President Trump is backing it. Likewise, no one should be refusing to take this vaccine simply because President Trump is backing it. The vaccine should be resisted because there is no way of knowing whether it is safe to enter our bodies. Besides, Dr. Fauci himself has already admitted that the vaccine may not even provide lasting protection against COVID-19 infection! Bill Gates (the world’s most famous vaccine peddler) stated that multiple doses of a coronavirus vaccine may be necessary to offer protection.
A recent LA Times article revealed sobering details about what the FDA qualifies as a “safe” and “effective” vaccine declaring:
Under recently released federal guidelines, a COVID-19 vaccine can be authorized for use if it is safe and proves effective in as few as 50% of those who receive it. And “effective” doesn’t necessarily mean stopping people from getting sick from COVID-19.
We’ve Been Down this Road Before
Innocent people have often served as guinea pigs of government-approved medical experimentation. From 1932 to 1972, the U.S. Public Health Service conducted a secret study on over 600 poor African American men from Macon County, Alabama to observe the natural progression of untreated syphilis. The purpose of the “Tuskegee Experiment” was to watch the participants suffer and die so they could study their bodies afterward.
In the experiment, 399 men were deliberately infected with latent syphilis while the remaining 201 were not infected. Untreated syphilis was known to cause blindness, deafness, mental illness, heart disease, bone deterioration, and could lead to death. The men were never told they had syphilis. For their participation they were promised free medical checks, food, transportation and burial insurance. When penicillin became the widespread treatment for syphilis in the 1940s, the participants never received one dose. Many of them may have unknowingly spread syphilis to their wives and girlfriends through sexual transmission. At least seven men died directly from syphilis infection while more than 150 died from heart failure which may have been caused by the disease.
The fraudulent study was finally exposed in 1972 by the Associated Press, putting an end to the cruel and inhumane experiment. In 1974, a $10 million settlement was reached in a class action lawsuit that was used to provide lifetime health benefits and burial services for study participants. Later, in 1975, the families of the participants were added to the lawsuit and the Tuskegee Health Benefit Program was established.
In summary, a federal agency conducted an experiment on over 600 men, many deliberately infected with syphilis while treatment was withheld. The men were deceived for 40 years as the research was conducted without their informed consent. In 1997, President Bill Clinton issued an apology to eight survivors on behalf of the federal government saying “they were betrayed.” President Clinton went on to state:
Medical people are supposed to help when we need care, but even once a cure was discovered, they were denied help, and they were lied to by their government. Our government is supposed to protect the rights of its citizens; their rights were trampled upon. Forty years, hundreds of men betrayed, along with their wives and children, along with the community in Macon County, Alabama, the City of Tuskegee, the fine university there, and the larger African American community.
Another example of government deception occurred in 1976. During the Swine Flu “pandemic,” 46 million Americans took a vaccine promoted by the CDC that had never been tested, for an epidemic that never materialized. At least 4,000 injuries were reported with two-thirds being severe, including neurological disorders like Guillain-Barré syndrome and death. The government paid out $3.5 billion to victims in damage claims.
60 Minutes exposed the CDC’s role in the scandal, their attempts at cover-up, and the fear-based media campaign that convinced millions of Americans to take the vaccine. At the time, even the pharmaceutical companies were reluctant to push a vaccine without proof a pandemic was eminent. In fact, many scientists did not believe the swine flu was serious enough to require vaccination and recommended against their use. However, the government would not be denied. Salon magazine’s Patrick Di Justo exposed Congress’ role in pushing the vaccine, stating:
As Di Justo’s statement indicates, the rush to produce a vaccine not proven safe isn’t new. History is currently being repeated and has the potential to go just as badly as it did in 1976. But the big pharmaceutical companies producing coronavirus vaccines will be protected from liability for any illness, injury or death that may occur. They were granted protection against lawsuits via the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act and the 2005 Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act (PREPA). This past February (and updated in September), A PREP Act declaration was issued to provide liability immunity for activities related to medical countermeasures against COVID-19.3 This protects companies like Moderna, Pfizer, Johnson & Johnson, and many other coronavirus vaccine makers from being sued if their products cause injury.
In August, many countries outside the U.S. granted AstraZeneca protection from future product liability claims related to its COVID-19 vaccine. Ruud Dobber, a member of Astra’s senior executive team, stated: “This is a unique situation where we as a company simply cannot take the risk if in … four years the vaccine is showing side effects.” Last month the company’s vaccine trial was suspended after a participant experienced an adverse reaction known as transverse myelitis, a rare but serious spinal inflammatory disorder. AstraZeneca CEO Pascal Soriot confirmed that the trial was also halted in July after a participant experienced neurological symptoms.
Moderna’s trials have not fared much better. In May, three of the 15 volunteers in their high dose cohort (250 mcg) suffered a “serious adverse event” within 43 days of receiving the vaccine.4 In July, their injection induced adverse reactions in ‘more than half’ of trial participants including fever, joint pain, nausea, fatigue, chills, headache, myalgia, and pain at the injection site. A person in Pfizer’s vaccine trial had chills so severe that he cracked a tooth because of uncontrollable chattering.
Unfortunately, participants in the current safety trials have little legal recourse to receive justice and/or compensation if injured or worse.5 If these types of serious reactions are occurring with small sample sizes, what would happen if these vaccines were taken by 50 or 75 percent of the world’s population as desired by vaccine vultures like Bill Gates?
Doubts About Safety & Efficacy
Thankfully, there is growing resistance from the public and medical and scientific communities to these rushed vaccines. In fact, a September USA Today/Suffolk poll revealed that two-thirds of Americans aren’t willing to get a COVID-19 vaccine when it first becomes available.
Over 400 leading vaccine authorities signed a letter to FDA Commissioner Stephen Hahn to ensure a thorough, transparent process that will give experts and the general public reassurance that the coronavirus vaccines are safe and effective. The letter states:
…However, we can only perform as advocates if we ourselves are persuaded that the vaccine(s) truly is safe and effective. We must be able to explain to the public what we know and what we donʼt know about these vaccines. For that to happen, we must be able to witness a transparent and rigorous FDA approval process that is devoid of political considerations.
A Belgian group called Docs 4 Open Debate wrote an open letter strongly criticizing the lockdown strategy and the rush to create vaccines. The letter has been signed by over 600 doctors, 1800 health professionals, and almost 14,000 citizens. On the subject of vaccines, the letter states:
Due to the continuous natural mutation of viruses, as we also see every year in the case of the influenza virus, a vaccine is at most a temporary solution, which requires new vaccines each time afterwards. An untested vaccine, which is implemented by emergency procedure and for which the manufacturers have already obtained legal immunity from possible harm, raises serious questions. We do not wish to use our patients as guinea pigs.
On a global scale, 700 000 cases of damage or death are expected as a result of the vaccine. If 95% of people experience Covid-19 virtually symptom-free, the risk of exposure to an untested vaccine is irresponsible.
Recently, other independent scientists and public health experts sounded the alarm about the lack of transparency from vaccine makers regarding their safety processes and standards. Dr. Eric Topol, a professor of molecular medicine and longtime expert on clinical trials, stated: “We’ve never had such an important clinical trial — or series of clinical trials — in recent history….Everything should be transparent.”
What Lies Ahead
Anyone with an ounce of brain cells left should be very wary of what governments, big pharma, and maniacal technocrats have planned for us. It is vital to understand what is taking place behind the scenes regarding the push to vaccinate the whole planet. In part two of this series, we’ll show how the “Decade of Vaccines” paved the way to vaccinate every American, and the coming media onslaught to convince everyone to take it. Stay tuned!
For further research on vaccine safety: