The globalists who planned for over 65 million deaths from a coronavirus during Event 201 are desperate to keep their narrative alive since so many people are seeing through all the lies about COVID-19. Now, the propaganda war I warned was coming in Part 3 of this series has fully commenced.
Mandatory vaccination is a hot topic right now. According to Dr. Anthony Fauci, the U.S. needs between 75% to 85% of its population to take a coronavirus vaccine to achieve herd immunity. However, over fifty thousand doctors and health scientists disagree that a vaccine is needed to achieve herd immunity. Fauci’s statement also flies in the face of the facts about coronavirus, namely, that over 98% of people infected with COVID-19 achieve a full recovery. A healthy immune system works better than any vaccine!
A Pew Research survey and several others reveal that a good portion of American’s have no intention of taking a vaccine. Nevertheless, ever since a pandemic was declared back on March 11, we’ve been told that the world will not go back to normal until a vaccine arrives. Since then, many nations have mandated what is tantamount to medical martial law lockdowns, leading to horrific results. In order to forgo lockdowns, Big Pharma and their government partners rushed to develop and distribute new, experimental vaccines in record time. Now we are on the precipice of a tipping point, as both the Pfizer/BioNTech and AstraZeneca vaccine candidates have been approved in select western countries with Moderna’s and other candidates waiting in the wings.
I’ve already pointed out some of the safety concerns with vaccines in Part 1 of this series. A growing number of adverse events are already being reported from vaccine trial participants, including:
- facial paralysis/Bell’s Palsy
- severe allergic reaction
- Transverse Myelitis
- neurological symptoms
- chills, fevers, fatigue, headache, shortness of breath, redness and swelling, and pain in the arm
- other severe adverse events
A full list of other potential side effects is documented in an FDA presentation from October.
Regarding the shot itself, Dr. William Schaffner, a vaccine expert and professor of infectious diseases at Vanderbilt University, said, “This is a nasty vaccine to get. It really makes your arm sore. It can make you feel crummy for 24 hours. And remember, it’s a two-dose vaccine. Well, guess what – the second dose is worse than the first.”
Legal Push for Mandatory Vaccination
Despite these warning signs, New York State is pushing the envelope in trying to pass a mandatory vaccination law. A recently proposed bill states:
Once the United States Food and Drug Administration’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research and the New York state clinical advisory task force have approved the safety and effectiveness of a COVID-19 vaccination and promotion and distribution plans of such vaccine have begun pursuant to the department’s COVID-19 vaccination administration program, if public health officials determine that residents of the state are not developing sufficient immunity from COVID-19, the department shall mandate vaccination for all individuals or groups of individuals who, as shown by clinical data, are proven to be safe to receive such vaccine.
With the FDA’s recent authorization of Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine for emergency use, the only exemption allowed in this proposed bill would be for those who receive one from a licensed medical professional.
In May, lawyer and legal scholar Alan Dershowitz stated in an interview:
Let me put it very clearly, you have no constitutional right to endanger the public and spread disease, even if you disagree… You have no right not to be vaccinated, you have no right not to wear a mask, you have no right to open up your business… And if you refuse to be vaccinated, the state has the power to literally take you to a doctor’s office and plunge a needle into your arm.
If the majority of the people agree and support that, for public health measures, you have to be vaccinated, you have to be vaccinated. They should give you an alternative. The alternative is to live in your home, don’t get vaccinated, but never ever leave your home or live in a bubble.
Dershowitz based his opinions on a misreading of Jacobson vs. Massachusetts, a 1905 Supreme Court case whose ruling actually discredits his statements. The truth is that the ruling reinforced that states could only impose a fine for individuals refusing mandatory vaccinations. The fine back then was $5, which today would be around $150.
There is no doubt that many bureaucrats, health officials, globalist overlords, and Big Pharma agents share Dershowitz’ incorrect interpretation of Jacobson vs. Massachusetts. The truth is that in many countries, mandatory vaccination laws are either unconstitutional or would face serious problems with enforcement. In the U.S., President Trump and “President-Elect” Joe Biden have both stated there will be no federal vaccine mandate. But this is no cause to celebrate because what may take place instead could have the same effect.
Going back to Dershowitz, here is the key takeaway if you refuse a coronavirus vaccine for whatever reason:
The alternative is to live in your home, don’t get vaccinated, but never ever leave your home or live in a bubble.
As I write this article, plans are being concocted to convince and coerce the vaccine resistant by making it very difficult to go anywhere or do anything without proof of having been vaccinated. Here are a few ways that society is morphing before our very eyes to compel everyone to take a COVID-19 vaccine.
Many governments have already figured out that resistance to vaccine mandates would cause too much trouble. In order to deflect responsibility for instituting vaccine laws, they enlisted their corporate cronies to create major societal obstacles for those who refuse the needle. One of these impediments include restrictions on travel. Without proof of a vaccine or negative COVID test, air travel may be impossible in the very near future.
Last month, Australia’s Qantas airlines became the first to publicly declare they would make vaccines mandatory for traveling into or out of the country. Qantas’ CEO Alan Joyce stated, “I’ve talked to my colleagues at other airlines across the globe, and I think it’s going to be a common theme across the board.”
Under the Travel Pass Initiative, the International Air Transport Association (IATA) announced it was close to completing development of a digital health pass that will include “a passenger’s testing and vaccine information and would manage and verify information among governments, airlines, laboratories and travelers.” The IATA represents 290 airlines or 82% of total air traffic.
Not to be left out, the World Health Organization is also getting involved in the push for digital vaccination certificates. A WHO medical expert stated, “We are looking very closely into the use of technology in this Covid-19 response, and one of them is how we can work with member states towards an e-vaccination certificate.”
There are several iterations of digital vaccine certificates in use or being tested including COVI-PASS, CommonPass, Vaccertify, and Tento Wallet. They are referred to by many generic names including immunity cards, immunity certificates, immunity passports, health passports, and digital certificates. The point is that eventually all airlines, and possibly all means of public transportation, may attempt to require this at some point.
To top it off, before Thanksgiving, New York City and parts of New Jersey implemented vehicle checkpoints at key bridges and crossings to enforce strict quarantine measures. This template could easily be replicated across the U.S. and countries around the world.
If it becomes difficult to even drive where you desire without proof of a vaccine or negative COVID test, how many people will succumb to the pressure?
One of the biggest debates taking place right now is whether private employers have the right to require vaccines as a condition of employment. Here are just a few of the headlines I’ve recently come across:
- Not Getting Vaccinated Can Cost You Your Job
- Can Employers Mandate Employees to Take a COVID-19 Vaccine?
- Yes, Your Employer Can Require You To Get A COVID Vaccine, With Some Exceptions
- Yes, the Government and Your Employer Can Make You Get a COVID-19 Vaccine
- Can Your Employer Require You to Get a COVID-19 Vaccine?
- Yes, Some Americans May Be Required to Get a COVID-19 Vaccine. But Not By the Federal Government.
- Government and Employers Can Make You Get a COVID-19 Vaccine
- Will the COVID-19 vaccine be Mandatory? What the Law Says
- Employers Start Preparing for the Coronavirus Vaccine with a Question: Can We Require It?
These headlines may seem confusing, but under current laws, private employers do have the right to require vaccines, but most don’t exercise it for various reasons. Although the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) allows for mandatory vaccination, it recommends private employers encourage employees to take the vaccine rather than require it. In addition, the EEOC requires private employers to provide at least two exemptions to any mandatory vaccine policy including: (1) a religious exemption (Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act) and (2) a disability exemption (Americans With Disabilities Act). There may also be exemptions for individuals for whom the vaccine would pose a grave risk to their health as determined by a physician.
What about people who don’t qualify for an exemption? An employer may offer other accommodations such as: wearing additional personal protective equipment, working remotely, taking a leave of absence, or having your job duties reassigned. If none of these options are available, termination is possible. This would be a bitter pill to swallow for most. There are legal options, but they may be risky and very costly for the average person.
Now is the time to be equipped with knowledge if you do not intend on taking a COVID-19 vaccine. Become familiar with state employment laws to avoid being caught by surprise if a vaccine mandate is implemented by your employer.
Financial Incentives and Restrictions
This week, new first-time unemployment claims jumped to 1.4 million in the U.S., the highest level since mid-September. People are struggling to get by as lockdowns and restrictions have shuttered thousands of small businesses, leaving many months behind on rent and mortgages. People are increasingly turning to drugs, alcohol, and suicide to escape their awful reality. Depression rates have skyrocketed as many worry about how to pay bills and feed their families.
The diabolical entities trying to usher in a Great Reset and replace humans with artificial intelligence are intent on capitalizing on the desperate situation many are in as a result of this plandemic. Recently, and straight out of the problem-reaction-solution playbook, comes the idea of bribing paying people to take a vaccine. Just take a look at the following headlines:
- Would You be Willing to get a COVID Vaccine in Exchange for a $1,500 Stimulus Check? How One Bold Proposal Would Work
- Want Herd Immunity? Pay People to Take the Vaccine
- Pay People to Get Vaccinated
- Good Reasons to Vaccinate: Mandatory or Payment for Risk?
- Pay People to Get COVID-19 Jab to Ensure Widespread Coverage, says Leading Ethicist
Oxford Professor Julian Savulescu, a leading ethicist, advocated paying people to take a COVID-19 vaccine to ensure herd immunity is reached,stating:
Mandatory vaccination, including for COVID-19, can be ethically justified if the threat to public health is grave, the confidence in safety and effectiveness is high, the expected utility of mandatory vaccination is greater than the alternatives, and the penalties or costs for non-compliance are proportionate. I describe an algorithm for justified mandatory vaccination. Penalties or costs could include withholding of benefits, imposition of fines, provision of community service or loss of freedoms.
The advantage of payment for risk is that people are choosing voluntarily to take it on. As long as we are accurate in conveying the limitations in our confidence about the risks and benefits of a vaccine, then it is up to individuals to judge whether they are worth payment.
Savulescu also believed payment in-kind may be a good strategy, suggesting, “One attractive benefit would be the freedom to travel, to not wear a mask in public places if you carried a vaccination certificate, and not to socially distance.”
Former congressman and presidential candidate John Delaney has proposed giving people $1,500 stimulus checks in exchange for getting immunized. Delaney stated in an interview:
The faster we get 75 percent of this country vaccinated, the faster we end Covid and the sooner everything returns to normal… We have to create, in my judgment, an incentive for people to really accelerate their thinking about taking the vaccine… If you’re still afraid of the vaccine and don’t want to take it, that’s your right.
Robert Litan, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, an American globalist think tank, proposed a $1,000 payment for each individual to take the vaccine. But his scheme goes even further, suggesting to only pay a small portion up front until the national threshold is reached for herd immunity. Litan states:
A potentially better idea is to hold back a substantial portion of the $1,000 – say $800 of it – until the 80 percent threshold is reached, ideally on a national basis, since people move around and can thus still spread the infection from the remaining hot spots. Because people who have taken the shot will get the balance, by check or wire, once the national vaccination threshold is crossed, they will have strong incentives to persuade their family members, neighbors, work colleagues, church members, and so on to get the shot so that everyone who does can collect the full $1,000 per person payment.
It will be interesting to see if this idea takes root. If so, it will be mostly the poor who will take the deal as the wealthy have no need of an extra thousand or fifteen hundred dollars. It’s fitting though, since this plandemic and the extreme measures taken to alter society have already taken an unfair toll on poor and middle-class people worldwide.
The vaccine propaganda machine has been unleashed and is barreling down the information highway like a bullet train. They are not even trying to hide that a psy-op is in play to get people to take the injection. The British army has deployed an elite “information warfare” unit to tackle online “misinformation” about the vaccines. This same unit was involved in combating Al-Qaeda and the Taliban. In their view, resisting a vaccine is the equivalent of being a terrorist! Their definition of misinformation is whatever Big Pharma and their government cronies say it is. The facts be damned.
Duplicating the WHO’s effort from earlier this year, Britain’s National Health Service is unleashing a celebrity/influencer campaign in an attempt to convince people into taking vaccines with the hope “that their advice to get immunized would be widely trusted.”
Also in Britain, top counter-terrorism officer and Metropolitan Police Assistant Commissioner Neil Basu questioned whether free speech should be allowed regarding vaccines, stating:
There is a debate for society to have about free speech and responsibility and people who are spreading misinformation that could cost people’s lives… whether that is the correct thing for this society to allow to happen.
The Evening Standard noted that Mr. Basu “stopped short of endorsing the idea of a new law but his intervention will strengthen pressure on ministers to act against conspiracy theorists making false claims about the vaccines.”
Any time the official narrative is questioned, they blame it on “conspiracy theorists.” This is to paint anyone who arrives at a different conclusion as a whack job. It’s funny though, because “conspiracy theorists” have been right about many things regarding this plandemic.
In America, officials are planning to appeal to patriotic duty as a way of coercing vaccine uptake. A USA Today article from August presented the template. The lead author, Dr. Michael Lederman, has very harsh views towards those who refuse vaccines. The article advocates severe measures to enforce vaccine compliance including:
- Exempting only those with medical contraindications to immunization
- Not allowing religious objections
- Not allowing objections for personal preference
- The issuance of vaccine certification cards (the CDC has already issued these!)
To top it off, Dr. Lederman and his partners equate vaccination with patriotic duty, asserting:
And while the measures that will be necessary to defeat the coronavirus will seem draconian, even anti-American to some, we believe that there is no alternative. Simply put, getting vaccinated is going to be our patriotic duty.
Acknowledging that “these measures might seem draconian,” the authors make no apologies for their recommendations. They even equate the pandemic to previous World Wars, stating:
We acknowledge that the refusal to obey rules one considers unjust is an American tradition. But another cornerstone of the American tradition is that we come together when it’s necessary. The best example of this was during the two world wars. Everyone contributed, no one was allowed to opt out merely because it conflicted with a sense of autonomy, and draft dodgers who refused to serve were subject to penalties.
True, conscientious objectors could refuse to use weapons for religious reasons, but they were obligated to help out in other ways, serving in noncombatant roles. There are no such alternatives for vaccination.
“President-Elect” Joe Biden recently backed away from his stance on mandatory vaccines and face masks and has instead taken his cue from Dr. Lederman’s sentiments, saying, “I’ll do everything in my power as president of the United States to encourage people to do the right thing and when they do it, demonstrate that it matters.”
This sleight of hand is the same trick President Trump performed in getting states and local jurisdictions to be the ones to issue these types of mandates. Don’t be fooled, Biden would require the vaccine in a heartbeat if there weren’t so much resistance to it.
Many state and local leaders are champing at the bit to unleash public pressure to take the vaccine. Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot is currently leading the charge. She expressed her desire for vaccine obedience in a recent interview with MSNBC, declaring:
Well, look, I always think it’s better to educate people into compliance if we can, but we can’t live in a world where only certain people are taking the vaccine and some are opting out… So, we’re looking at a range of options, but our first choice, obviously, is educating people into compliance, demonstrating to them the safety of the vaccine. I will take the vaccine, as will my leadership team, and we’re encouraging people of good will and faith across the city to do the same.
Ontario’s Premier Doug Ford goes a bit further than Lightfoot, revealing:
There may be some restrictions in terms of travel or other restrictions that may arise as a result of not having a vaccination, but that’s going to be up to the person themselves to make that decision on the basis of what’s most important to them. But we do wish everyone to receive the vaccination.
Constitutionally, I don’t think we can force every single person to take it and I just don’t believe in forcing people to take this. What I do believe (is) encouraging everyone, everyone possible out there to get a vaccination shot.
This word salad is just a cover for the obstacles authorities are attempting to put in place for those choosing not to be vaccinated.
To continue the psy-op trend, Katy Milkman, a behavioral scientist and professor at the University of Pennsylvania, thinks that “social proof”needs to be part of the effort to get people vaccinated. She suggests that “after getting jabbed, people should be encouraged to text their friends, post on social media and sport ‘I got the Covid-19 vaccine’ stickers.” Milkman also believes in censoring information and bowing to the opinion of authority figures, adding:
Research suggests that Facebook, Twitter and others could help by altering their algorithms to up-rank content on vaccines from trusted sources and prompt people to consider the accuracy of news before sharing. Furthermore, since we look to authority figures for validation of our beliefs, fears and conspiracy theories, it will also be critical for leaders from across the political spectrum to present a unified message about the value of vaccines.
To go even further, Milkman advocates that doctors and pharmacists text, mail letters, and place calls to harass remind people about vaccination appointments. She even suggested making it a fun event where you get free ice cream to go along with your poison jab!
Entertainment/Essential Services Restrictions
Another way of tightening the screws against vaccine resisters is by restricting access to fun and entertainment. In November, Ticketmaster (part of Live Nation Entertainment, the world’s leading live entertainment company), announced it had been working on a way to get fans back to attending concerts, festivals, sporting events, etc. by tracking their testing and vaccination status.
Though they later stated this would not be mandatory to gain access to events (yeah right), the plan relies on three separate components – the Ticketmaster digital ticket app, third party health information companies like CLEAR Health Pass or IBM’s Digital Health Pass, and testing and vaccine distribution providers like LabCorp and the CVS Minute Clinic.
What if something like this were to be extended to grocery stores, retail stores, movie theaters, museums, amusement parks, salons and barber shops, fitness centers, and other places that people visit every day?
Resistance is Not Futile
Alan Dershowitz was taken to task on his “plunge a needle into your arm” statements when he appeared on an episode of Del Bigtree’s The Highwire show and in a live debate with Robert Kennedy Jr. The point is that once Dershowitz was presented with facts, he softened his hardline stance and ended up agreeing with a lot of the points made by Bigtree and Kennedy Jr. Currently, there is no federal or state law that can force mandatory vaccination upon its citizens. Jacobson vs. Massachusetts does not apply!
We need to be armed with the facts. Do not trust the FDA, NIH, CDC, or any government agency with your health! The clinical trials for the vaccines were designed to succeed. If these vaccines work so well, why are public health officials still saying masks and social distancing will be necessary for the vaccinated?
Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro, who publicly stated he would refuse a COVID-19 vaccine, couldn’t have answered this question any better, declaring:
I tell you; I will not take (any vaccine). It is my right and I am sure that Congress will not create difficulties for whoever doesn’t want to take a vaccine.
If it is effective, lasting, reliable, whoever doesn’t take it will be doing harm only to himself, and who takes the vaccine will not be infected. There’s nothing to worry about.
Forcing people to take the vaccine or say that who doesn’t take it cannot get a passport, have a public job, that’s dictatorship…Whoever defends that is a dictator. Or a false dictator that is willing to do business with the lives of others.
If it is not your intention to take a vaccine, don’t allow propaganda, public pressure, or the threat of restrictions on your freedom to change your mind. The more who are willing to resist now—no matter the cost—the greater the victory will be achieved for freedom and bodily autonomy in the future.
As documented in Part 2 of this series, the plan to vaccinate for COVID-19 is global in scope. In Part 5, I’ll closely examine the ingredients in the COVID-19 vaccines and why Bill Gates and others are so adamant that all of humanity gets injected with them.
Please feel free to share your thoughts in the comments section.